Carbon Markets Weekly: Carbon Markets Tighten Rules as Capture Projects Scale Up
Gold Standard announced a next-generation Impact Registry, developed with climate technology firm Trovio and due to launch in the fourth quarter of 2026, built on an API-first platform that connects credit issuance, transfer and retirement with national registries, exchanges and marketplaces. The upgrade responds to long-standing complaints that fragmented, manually operated registries have made it hard to verify credit provenance and prevent double counting, and it arrives just as corporate buyers and European regulators begin demanding data that is auditable and interoperable. The organisation is simultaneously tightening its certification rules, a combination that raises integrity but has unsettled some project developers — a tension likely to define the next phase of the voluntary market.
Preventing double counting is not only a registry problem, and Gold Standard’s second move of the week tackled it from the insurance side. The body approved a fifth insurance policy for developers seeking eligibility under the international aviation offsetting scheme CORSIA, admitting UK-based Blenheim Partnerships as the first conventional political risk insurer to participate. Because credits used by airlines must not also be claimed by host governments, insurance-backed guarantees offer developers a route to market where states have been slow to apply the required accounting adjustments under the Paris Agreement. With eligible supply still running well below projected demand for the current compliance phase, expanding underwriting capacity may do more for supply than any single new project — though it shifts sovereign policy risk onto private insurers rather than eliminating it.
While Gold Standard rebuilt its plumbing, Verra pressed on with renovating its rulebook. The standards body published VMR0018, a revised methodology for crediting methane avoidance from wastewater and manure systems, replacing a framework inherited from the Kyoto-era Clean Development Mechanism that will be retired from mid-2027 under a phased transition. The change matters because methane is far more potent than carbon dioxide over short timeframes, and methane credits have become an important revenue stream for farm and wastewater operators funding solids-separation and biogas equipment — making the credibility of the underlying accounting rules a commercial as well as a scientific question.
Those same Verra rules are now generating new supply in a region that has historically produced little of it. The registry recorded a second verification and issuance for Ecobase’s pan-European afforestation project, with 25,408 verified units across the 2023 and 2024 vintages drawn from planting areas in eight countries. The volumes are small, but the imbalance they address is not: European buyers account for a large share of global voluntary demand while the continent supplies comparatively few credits, and Ecobase’s model — more than 230,000 hectares enrolled and a far larger forest management scheme already registered — offers one of the few scalable European origination pipelines.
If Europe’s challenge is building supply, Asia’s is rebuilding trust in it. Indonesia’s Rimba Raya Biodiversity Reserve, the world’s largest verified avoided-deforestation project, has begun preparing for a return to the international market after the restoration of its concession, with work under way on documentation updates, a fresh validation audit and community engagement. The project embodies the forest-carbon sector’s whole trajectory — pioneering certification and blue-chip buyers on one side, sustained challenge to its baseline assumptions on the other — and its relaunch, timed as Verra shifts the sector to more conservative jurisdictional baselines, will test whether reformed rules can restore confidence in avoided-deforestation credits at scale.
Certification pressure is spreading beyond the carbon market into heavy industry. Vallourec secured certification from the Global Steel Climate Council for its decarbonisation pathway, having cut its average emissions intensity from 1.70 to 1.16 tonnes of CO2e per tonne of hot-rolled steel between 2021 and 2025, already beating the standard’s 2030 threshold. The council noted it was the first certified member running both integrated and electric arc furnace production, a detail with wider significance: it suggests verified progress is possible across differing steelmaking routes at a time when independent climate verification is fast becoming a commercial requirement for the sector’s customers and investors.
Where standards bodies supply the rules, financial institutions supply the demand, and the week’s largest credit purchase showed how that demand is changing shape. National Australia Bank signed its biggest ever acquisition of Australian Carbon Credit Units, a five-year agreement with Arnhem Land Fire Abatement NT securing roughly 150,000 units to 2031, generated by Indigenous-managed early dry-season burning that prevents more destructive late-season wildfires. The deal reflects two converging forces: regulatory reform under Australia’s Safeguard Mechanism driving structural demand for domestic credits, and corporate buyers moving from annual spot purchases to multi-year contracts for supply certainty — with a stable revenue stream for First Nations land management as the counterpart benefit.
Not every financial institution is buying credits; some are still learning to count. Canadian insurer Wawanesa joined the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials, committing to measure and disclose emissions linked to a defined portion of its portfolio within three years, while stressing that membership imposes no targets or restrictions on its underwriting and investment decisions. That careful framing captures where much of the financial sector currently stands: building measurement capability under regulatory and investor pressure, within an initiative now spanning more than 750 institutions, while keeping commercial discretion firmly intact.
The week’s biggest money, however, went not to credits but to concrete and steel, starting in Canada. The federal government, Alberta and the Oil Sands Alliance agreed to advance the Pathways carbon capture project — expected to remove 16 million tonnes of emissions annually — in a deal explicitly tied to approval of a new oil pipeline carrying up to one million barrels a day to the west coast. Carbon contracts for difference, guaranteeing a long-term price floor and ceiling, are positioned as the mechanism making the multi-billion-dollar scheme bankable, yet the producer alliance still argues the accompanying carbon tax framework leaves it internationally uncompetitive. Supporters will read the package as pragmatic coalition-building; critics will note that emissions abatement has been made conditional on expanded fossil fuel exports — and both readings are consistent with the announced terms.
Canada’s experience also shows what happens when that political alignment is missing, as the parallel case in the American Midwest demonstrates. The Iowa Utilities Commission amended the construction permit for Summit Carbon Solutions’ proposed carbon dioxide pipeline after South Dakota banned the use of eminent domain for such projects, invalidating the originally approved interstate route. The regulator replaced its state-specific condition with a broader requirement that Summit demonstrate a continuous, fully authorised path from Iowa’s ethanol plants to a compliant storage site, while keeping the construction ban in place — confirmation that land rights and state politics, not engineering, remain the binding constraint on carbon pipelines in the region.
Engineering questions have not disappeared, though, and Europe moved this week to answer one before it becomes a problem. Gasunie, Energie Beheer Nederland and DNV launched CO2RE, a two-year research programme testing how impurities in captured carbon dioxide behave under pipeline pressure and temperature, with the aim of setting safe composition thresholds for shared networks. Because future infrastructure must carry CO₂ from many different industrial sources without corrosion or operational risk, harmonised quality specifications are a quiet prerequisite for the cross-border transport networks that Europe’s capture ambitions assume.
The capture technology feeding those networks reached a milestone of its own in Germany. The Catch4Climate consortium — Buzzi, Heidelberg Materials, SCHWENK Zement and Vicat — inaugurated the world’s first industrial-scale pure oxyfuel cement plant at Mergelstetten, using a thyssenkrupp Polysius process that burns pure oxygen instead of air to concentrate CO₂ in the exhaust, enabling capture of up to 95% of emissions. Crucially, that includes the process emissions from limestone calcination that no amount of fuel switching can remove, in an industry responsible for roughly 7–8% of global carbon dioxide output — which is why the plant’s operational data may ultimately matter more than its modest production capacity.
Alongside these future-facing projects, one utility offered proof that established methods can already outrun their targets. Pacific Gas and Electric reported a 60% cut in methane emissions from its gas pipeline network against a 2015 baseline, beating California’s 2025 regulatory requirement and its own 2030 goal five years early — achieved not through any single breakthrough but by prioritising the largest leaks, expanding mobile detection, halving major repair times and curbing venting during maintenance. The result strengthens the argument that disciplined leak detection and repair is among the fastest, cheapest climate levers available, though self-reported utility figures will always benefit from independent verification.
At the opposite end of the technology spectrum, the market’s soil-based frontier produced encouraging but unproven results. Biochar Now and Guatemalan regenerative agriculture firm Agricultura Tecnología Pasión reported early trial data showing spinach yields roughly 90% higher and leather leaf yields around 200% higher on treated plots, with signs of beneficial nitrogen-fixing microbes around corn roots. If confirmed by the independent analysis now under way, the findings would reinforce biochar’s dual appeal — productivity gains plus long-duration carbon storage — but they remain preliminary, drawn from demonstration plots rather than controlled research.
Last but not least, Canadian climate solutions company Karbon-X announced a partnership with REGID International to assess the Kenya BioHub Initiative, an integrated land restoration and biomass programme intended to support Kenyan industrial decarbonisation, with no volumes, land area or investment figures yet disclosed.
To learn more about our carbon market capabilities, please visit